aBraXaS!

sHe, “The-iT” aT aBraXaS!

aLike:

sHe has GROWN up!

Nana baBa jaH-aYe/Stanley Alexander MARTIN

CONCLUSION of aBraXaS! work:

THIS IS WHAT THE space-TIME_ContinUUm LOOKS like aT aBraXaS!:

E”((0^1 ) + (0^1) ~= E ((1^0 + 1^1) ~= E((+1) ~= 2((i^2) ~= -1)) ~= E(tOO ~= “3″))”….

:sHe is called “ToTaL!”:

Or:

A Torus:

….Zooming OUT: aLL LIKE a Torus!….

….Zooming out, The-iT looks like a Chess-board of Rolling-and-Tumbling Die!….

….Zooming out, inFinitely REPEATS! Differently, Like a MandebrOt Fractal!….

….Zooming out, PEAKS! variously/repetitively Like a Torus!

….aT a “Peak”, The-It Looks like a Dice!

….Zooming OUT, Etc. & etc….

Stanley Alexander MARTIN/Nana baBa jaH-aYe….

Yoo! aT Windows....

ARGUMENT DERIVED FROM A NATURE OF THE-IT

There is a “one” that is -1/i2 do 1
There is a one that is 1: do 2
therefore, there is a “one” that is 2….do 3
For every “act” there is at least a  possible THREE “do’s”/event-lines….act 1
In the nAture of the-It, there is do absurdity, do illogic, and do logic…. act
2
In the nAture of the-It, there is do wrong, do right, and do good…. act 3
A branch of a tree must always go towards the light (”up” normally), by its
nature, that is its act 2 logic: but by act 1/act 3 nAture of the-It, it then
has three choices of directions: do right LEFT to; do right RIGHT to; and do
right STRAIGHT TOWARDS: the good that it does is always higher/better than do
right…. play/work 1
A DUALISM which describes a “Two” as Universal: The Evil/The Good, but is not
the “One” is therefore an illogic…. play/work 2
The Universal, The-Good, then describes the two that is the “one” (A “3″), and
is Higher/Better than Wrong/Right, though often by the-Its nAture is inclusive
of these….play/work 3
Thus:
Any Particular, by Its Achievements, could be considered as the universal (A
Universal), and godly… This, as the Christ by His Works, achieved the status
of a Son of God, and therefore godly, and therefore A Part of the Essential of
God… Thus may His followers by being Christlike, achieve the Same….Thus, Any
Particular may be considered The Good… As, Any Wrong may be considered as A
Universal, and therefore Evil, All being A Universal of the-It (The God: The
All-of-All): therefore, “All” being The Good, but Some Parts considerd as Some
Evil: Evil being derived from -1/i2, An Absurdity in the nAture of the-It…
The Evocation: Satan, being Evil, Being Lesser than God, but A Part of
God….drama 1
There Being One God…..
And, since according to Too, -1/i2 transforms to be equivalent to 1/2, it is not
true in this mythic that the Totality of the perceived Negation equals the
Totality of the Affirmation; after the Totality of the perceived Negation is
Removed/Abandoned, a “One” that is half the Affirmed Good remains…..
In this, if the Good God is not Acting at aBraXas (”Fullness”), the Act will be
perceived as Wrong, or Right, and the Actor perceived as A Lesser Deity….

      Too Logics….
      Meditation Exercise:
      Thesis on the Faces of the One-God….

     A Species Faith!

Nana baBa jaH-aYe/Stanley Alexander MARTIN

Rainham, KENT 11-02-2009

aie! Totem

0 : 1 ~: “*(2 aT 3)….

Nought contradicts One, to be translated to Be a “Third”!

ONE/ONE
      (from ¬Theology, “The Death of the God”)
      00.–à zen myth : Transformations
              All science is based on transformation, or “myth”…
              We have to translate our mythics into transformation matrices of
              the type: [ A ]
              And work on their determinant values…
              Determinants: Laws
              Similitude
              One can’t be the same as someone else…
              But one can be a similar one…
        The determinant of a too matrix = the determinant of its transpose…
          | A | :~ | AT | = | AT |
          e.g.…. | 1 1 | :~ | 0 0 | = | 0 0 |
          | 0 0 | | 1 1 | | 1 1 |
        Interchanging two rows or columns of a too determinant | A | changes the
        sign of the determinant…
                  | B | = - | A |
          e.g.…. | 1 1 | :~ | 0 0 | = -| 0 0 |
      |                                              0 0 | | 1 1 | | 1 1 |
        If one obtains a too matrix [B] by multiplying one row/column by a
        constant c,
        | B | = c. | A |
                  e.g.…. [1 0 ][ 0 1] ~ [ 1 1 ]
                             |1 0 || 0 1| ~ | 1 1 |
        If two rows/columns of a too matrix is identical, | A | = a “0″…
        e.g.…. | 1 0 | = a “0″…
                   | 1 0 |
        If one derives | B | from | A | by adding a multiple of one row/column
        to another, | B | = | A |
        e.g.…. (I^2) = | 1 0 | = | 1 0 | = (I^2) (-(I^2)) = (I^2) . (I^4) =
        2(I^2) = unity…
        | 0 1 |
        In any n x n matrices, | AB | = | A | | B |
        e.g.…. Too :~ “1″ . “1″ . “1″ = | 0 1 | = | 1 0 | | 1 0 |
                                                                    | 1 0 | | 0 1 | | 0 1 |
              Too:
      Myths: A = F (x) : F (y) ~ “Too”…
      -(I^2):(I^4) (I^2) : (I^4)
      
          Too = F (I^2} I^4) : F (Y)/”1″
                         x                  -x/(I^2)x
          ~ | 1 0 | ~ | 0 1 | ~ | 1 0 | ~ | 0 1 |
             ~ | 0 1 | |1 0 |
                  (I^2) ~ (-(I^2)) ~ 2(I^2) ~ “1″
                  ~ (1/(I^2) ~ “2″…
              do 1
              “Too” myth is defined as:
      (1/2) ~ (I^2) ~ |1 0 |
      too ~ “1″ ~ | 0 1|
      do 2
      A^0 = (1/(A^-1) = A^1…
              act 1
      1/(I^2) ~ “2″ ~ |1 0 || 0 1| ~ | 1 1 |
      | 1 1 | :~ “2″
      | 0 0 |
                    transposes into :~
                  | 0 0 | :~ (1/(-2)) :~ (-1/2)
                  | 1 1 |
              act 2
              a too transposed that is equivalent to | “0″ |…
                                                                          | 1 1 | —–à fullness “too”, equivalent to aBraxas “2″, a too
              that is “4″…
              | 1 1 |
              act 3
              
              (1/too) is equivalent to (too)^(too)….
              Act 4
              Too: “1″/”2″:
              (1/(I^2)) . (1/(I^2)) . (1/2)
              ~ | 0 1 || 0 1 ||1 0|
                  |1 0 || 1 0 |
      ~ 2((1/(I^2)). (1/2) ~ “2″ : = | 1 |
                                                 | 1 |
              Similarly, “for” myth is defined as:
              ~ | 0 0 1 |
                  | 0 1 0 |
                  | 1 0 0 |….
              1/(I^2) . (I^2) . (I^2) = “2″ = a too…
              play 1
              Our methods describe that “3″ is NOT/prime, and is a “too” =
“for”…
                  | 1 0 0 |
                  | 0 1 0 |
                  | 0 0 1 |….
              Is “for” unity = (I^2) . (I^2) . (I^2) : (1/2)…
              A “1″ that is unity : “2″ :~ a “3″, and, therefore, too…
              And, “neUn” myth, is:
              “for” aBraxas:
              ~ 9((I^4) ~ “9″ := | 1 1 1 |
                                         | 1 1 1 |
                                         | 1 1 1
|…
              aBraxas “for” = neUn….
              Play 2
              Similarly, “preScient” myth, is:
              (neUn) + (neUn) + (too-for):
      | 1 1 1 | + | 1 1 1 | + | 1 0 0 |
      | 1 1 1 |     | 1 1 1 |    | 0 1 0 |
      | 1 1 1 |     | 1 1 1 |    | 0 0 1 |
              ~ 18(I^4) + “1″ ~ “19″….
              play 3
              Primes logarithm…
              If P is a prime…
              If any the ((x /y) . (z) is not equal to P…
            act 5
                  means P is a prime number,
                  as long as any the x, y, z, is not a multiple of P itself….
              Proof “3″ is not/prime but is a too…
                              As (root 2) = approx. 1.4142,
                              and, (1 + -(I^2)) = (I^2) ; (1/2) ; (1 + (1/2)) ;
                              2…
              From above, 1.4142 is equivalent to = (1 + (1/2) - “0!”)…
              do 3
                  Therefore in neUn maths…
                  ((1 + (1/2)^2) is equivalent to a too…
                              = 9/4,
                              this is equivalent to 2 + (((I^2) = (1/2))^2) =
                              (2 + (I^4))
              = “3″…
              in the re-Construction, ((root 2)^2) :~ 2 ~ “3″…
            play 4
                  similarly,
                  (1 + (I^2)) . 1/(-(I^2)) :~ “2″ + “1″ = “3″…
              this obeys act 1, so 3 is a too, not a prime….
              Demo 1
              In transformations:
      “1″ ~= “2″ = too
      for = too . too = too…
      neUn = for . for
      or, = (too . too) + (too . too) = too…
      preScient = neUn + neUn + too = (for . for) + (for . for) + too
      or, = too. ((too . too) + (too . too)) + too = too…
              The too is iNfinite….
              time-space tranformations
                    the neUn field
                    too time, with 8/9 referents, (as in language)…
      | “0″ | : |no-Time| no-eternal
      | “1″ | | present | : perfect -”double”
                                        no - eternal, now, eternal
      
      | “2″ | : | future | : perfect -”double”
                                       no - eternal, past, now, eternal
      
      
      | “3″ | : | past | : perfect -”double”
                                 no - eternal, past, now, eternal
      “We shall now refers to instrumental time “t” as t…..”
      All is “one”, and is unique, constructed of ones…
      As one is Similitude, All-one is equal in the fLaws of Events, the outcome
      of a co-incident depends on the individual circumstance; events between
      two individuals can only have similar outcomes to a previous co-incident….
      Dramatic change in a Set of events comes from outside the Set…..
      For one to be in “Hell”, one must insistently be confronted with
      contradictions arising from (i^2)…. This may be from oneself, or one’s
      condition….
      Confront each contradiction in turn with its own contradiction… This
      creates one-ness….
      (I^2). (I^2) = a “1″!
      Turn the contradiction on its head, this gives one a viable alternative…
      (I^2) :~ 1/(I^2) = a “2″!
      
      “0″
      The Word of God: sHe, is the utterance of nothingness…. “The Roaring
      Silence”….
      If one ascends enough, one becomes Connected, and lives within the-It….
      Any “noise” will make sense because of the Nature of the Word: music will
      “converse” with one; light will have a serenity that is blissful, a smell
      may suggest holiness, as may a taste, another location….One may connect to
      spirits, or other consciousnesses…..
      Later, after he has resolved his contradictions, one rises from “wrong” to
      “right”, becomes “fine”, and accepts heaven…
      Until the arrival in a heaven, your Dark One, who offers the
      contradictions of “hell” is instrumental - do not eradicate him…..
      If one is in ascent, Seth is the made apparent…
      On a level, in heaven, there is rest, peace, bliss, serenity: a loving
      calm and quiet…. One is closest to the God…..
      
            
            BEFORE
            TOP
            AFTER
             
            HOME

3. BISHOP BERKELEY: As “You!” are HERE, “*(reaDing)!”: THUS “I”….

Nana baBa jaH-aYe/Stanley Alexander MARTIN

Rainham, 15:15 BST February 15th 2009

Nana baBa jaH-aYe

Welcome to www.abraxas.Moozim.com 

This site is dedicated to The Theory of Everything of Nana baBa jaH-aYe/Stanley Alexander MARTIN, & its applications….